Morrow v MetLife Invs. Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Morrow v MetLife Invs. Ins. Co. 2019 NY Slip Op 08036 Decided on November 8, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 8, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
945 CA 18-02027

[*1]CRYSTAL MORROW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND JUAN "JIN" ZHOU, FINANCIAL SERVICES REPRESENTATIVE AND INVESTMENT ADVISOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHRISTOPHER J. SEUSING OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LOUIS ROSADO, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (E. Jeannette Ogden, J.), entered April 19, 2018. The order, among other things, denied in part the motion of defendants MetLife Investors Insurance Company and Juan "Jin" Zhou to dismiss plaintiff's complaint against them.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Morrow v MetLife Investors Ins. Co. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Nov. 8, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: November 8, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.