Matter of Dillenbeck v Trzcinski

Annotate this Case
Matter of Dillenbeck v Trzcinski 2019 NY Slip Op 06949 Decided on September 27, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 27, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
893 CAF 18-00539

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD D. DILLENBECK, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

KELLY C. TRZCINSKI, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ————————————————————-—-



IN THE MATTER OF KELLY C. TRZCINSKI, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

EDWARD D. DILLENBECK, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.



PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

JULIE GIRUZZI-MOSCA, UTICA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Julia Brouillette, J.), entered March 9, 2018 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that Kelly C. Trzcinski had willfully violated orders of the court and awarded Edward D. Dillenbeck sole custody of the subject children.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: September 27, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.