O'Neill v O'Neill

Annotate this Case
O'Neill v O'Neill 2019 NY Slip Op 05933 Decided on July 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on July 31, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
702 CA 18-00552

[*1]THOMAS H. O'NEILL, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

ROSE R. O'NEILL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)



LAW OFFICE OF RALPH C. LORIGO, WEST SENECA, JAMES P. RENDA, BUFFALO, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SCHOEMAN UPDIKE KAUFMAN & GERBER LLP, NEW YORK CITY (BETH L. KAUFMAN OF COUNSEL), AND KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK & NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.) entered February 13, 2018. The judgment awarded defendant maintenance arrears.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in O'Neill v O'Neill ([appeal No. 4] — AD3d — [July 31, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: July 31, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.