Matter of Howard v Howard

Annotate this Case
Matter of Howard v Howard 2018 NY Slip Op 06409 Decided on September 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 28, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1036 CAF 16-02139

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS E. HOWARD, JR., PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

AMANDA L. HOWARD, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



PAUL A. NORTON, CLINTON, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DIANE MARTIN-GRANDE, ROME, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, UTICA, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Julia Brouillette, J.), entered October 17, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, placed conditions on respondent's parenting time with one of the subject children.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 28, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.