Matter of Canough v Trainham
Annotate this CaseDecided on November 10, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
1052 CAF 15-00900
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF AMY R. CANOUGH, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
TODD R. TRAINHAM, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered May 8, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied the objections of respondent to an order of a Support Magistrate.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Matter of Chautauqua County Dept. of Social Servs. v Rita M.S., 94 AD3d 1509, 1510; see also Matter of Ball v Marshall, 103 AD3d 1270, 1271).
Entered: November 10, 2016
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.