Matter of Jay v Graham

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jay v Graham 2015 NY Slip Op 00060 Decided on January 2, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
1262 TP 14-00878

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF NATHANIEL JAY, PETITIONER,

v

HAROLD D. GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT, AND JOSEPH L. VASILE, LIEUTENANT, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENTS.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.], entered May 13, 2014) to review a determination of respondents. The determination found after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.



NATHANIEL JAY, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS.



It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Free v Coombe , 234 AD2d 996).

Entered: January 2, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.