Dartnell Enters., Inc. v Hewlett-Packard Co.

Annotate this Case
Dartnell Enters., Inc. v Hewlett-Packard Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 08285 Decided on November 13, 2015 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 13, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
1168 CA 15-00575

[*1]DARTNELL ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY (INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO COMPAQ COMPUTER CORPORATION), DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (H. TODD BULLARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM G. BAUER OF COUNSEL), MORGAN LEWIS & BROCKIUS LLP, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. Stander, J.), entered June 18, 2014. The order, among other things, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: November 13, 2015

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.