Abbo-Bradley v City of Niagara FallsAnnotate this Case
Decided on October 2, 2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1070 CA 14-02114
[*1]JOANN ABBO-BRADLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DYLAN J. BRADLEY, TREVOR A. BRADLEY AND CHASE Q. BRADLEY, INFANTS, ZACHARY HERR AND MELANIE HERR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF COLETON HERR AND HEATHER HERR, INFANTS, AND NATHAN E. KORSON AND ELENA KORSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF LOGAN J. KORSON, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND CECOS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 4.)
PHILLIPS & PAOLICELLI LLP, NEW YORK CITY (STEPHEN J. PHILLIPS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
LATHROP & GAGE, LLP, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS (RUSSELL EGGERT, OF THE ILLINOIS BAR, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), AND WEBSTER SZANYI LLP, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), entered August 22, 2014. The order granted the motion of defendant CECOS International, Inc. to dismiss the second amended complaint against it and dismissed the action against that defendant.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying that part of the motion of defendant CECOS International, Inc., seeking to dismiss the second amended complaint against it and reinstating the second amended complaint against that defendant except insofar as the third and fourth causes of action assert claims by each plaintiff as parent and natural guardian of an infant child or children, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Abbo-Bradley v City of Niagara Falls ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 2, 2015]).
Entered: October 2, 2015
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court