Bird v Geico Gen. Ins. Co.

Annotate this Case
Bird v Geico Gen. Ins. Co. 2014 NY Slip Op 07856 Decided on November 14, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
1148 CA 14-00378

[*1]BRITT BIRD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Shirley Troutman, J.), entered July 24, 2013. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to renew her motion for leave to amend her complaint.



LAW OFFICES OF WAYNE C. FELLE, P.C., WILLIAMSVILLE (ELIZABETH A. BRUCE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LAW OFFICE OF DANIEL R. ARCHILLA, BUFFALO (LAUREN M. YANNUZZI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 16, 2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 14, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.