Matter of Roth v City of Syracuse
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of Norman E. Roth et al., Appellants, v City of Syracuse et al., Respondents.
—[*1] Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Alan J. Pierce of counsel), for petitioners-appellants.
Juanita Perez Williams, Corporation Counsel, Syracuse (Joseph Francis Bergh of counsel), for respondents-respondents.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered March 12, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order denied the petition.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
All concur, except Lindley, J., who is not participating. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Green, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.