Matter of Roth v City of Syracuse

Annotate this Case
Matter of Roth v City of Syracuse 2010 NY Slip Op 08266 [78 AD3d 1590] November 12, 2010 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2011

In the Matter of Norman E. Roth et al., Appellants, v City of Syracuse et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (Alan J. Pierce of counsel), for petitioners-appellants.

Juanita Perez Williams, Corporation Counsel, Syracuse (Joseph Francis Bergh of counsel), for respondents-respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered March 12, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7. The order denied the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

All concur, except Lindley, J., who is not participating. Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Lindley and Green, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.