Ritorto v Silverstein

Annotate this Case
Ritorto v Silverstein 2020 NY Slip Op 02872 Decided on May 14, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 14, 2020
Richter, J.P., Oing, Singh, Moulton, JJ.
11508N 653483/18

[*1] Joseph P. Ritorto, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Larry A. Silverstein, et al., Defendants-Respondents.



Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, New York (Daniel J. Kornstein of counsel), for appellant.

Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York (Jeffrey R. Wang of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about March 13, 2019, which granted defendants' motion to stay the action pending arbitration of the issue, and denied plaintiff's cross motion to stay the arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This action, asserting claims to cash distributions from plaintiff's beneficial interest in defendant Silverstein Development Corporation's interest in 7 World Trade Center Company, requires interpretation and enforcement of a 2005 settlement agreement between the parties, which includes a provision mandating arbitration of "[a]ny action to enforce any provision" of the agreement. Accordingly, the court correctly found that the dispute is governed by the arbitration provision.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 14, 2020

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.