People v Jasquez

Annotate this Case
People v Jasquez 2019 NY Slip Op 02037 Decided on March 19, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 19, 2019
Sweeny, J.P., Webber, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.
205/15 -4420/15 8739 8738

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Randy Jasquez, Defendant-Appellant.



Christina A. Swarns, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (David Billingsley of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Valerie Figueredo of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered March 25, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MARCH 19, 2019

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.