People v Hueston

Annotate this Case
People v Hueston 2018 NY Slip Op 06190 Decided on September 25, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 25, 2018
Acosta, P.J., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.
7141 1562/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kevin Hueston, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Robert McIver of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond Bruce, J.), rendered October 14, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2018

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.