Easley v Animal Med. Ctr.

Annotate this Case
Easley v Animal Med. Ctr. 2018 NY Slip Op 03480 Decided on May 15, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 15, 2018
Richter, J.P., Andrias, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.
6558 158328/12

[*1]Linda Greene Easley, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

The Animal Medical Center, Defendant-Respondent, Brenna Zortman, et al., Defendants.



Iannuzzi and Iannuzzi, New York (John Nicholas Iannuzzi of counsel), for appellant.

Mischel & Horn, P.C., New York (Scott T. Horn of counsel), for, respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered on or about November 28, 2016, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because the dog that bit plaintiff had no known vicious propensities, no liability will attach to either of the defendant dog owners (see Doerr v Goldsmith, 25 NY3d 1114 [2015]; Collier v Zambito, 1 NY3d 444 [2004]), or defendant Animal Medical Center, the veterinary hospital where the dog bite occurred (Petrone v Fernandez, 12 NY3d 546, 550 [2009]; Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc., 40 AD3d 224 [1st Dept 2007], affd 10 NY3d 787 [2008]; Christian v Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc., 54 AD3d 707 [2d Dept 2008]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 15, 2018

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.