People v Mora-Diaz
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 5, 2017
Richter, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern, Singh, JJ.
5134 5691/12
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Leonardo Mora-Diaz, Defendant-Appellant.
Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Anita Aboagye-Agyeman of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sheila L. Bautista of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael J. Obus, J.), rendered June 6, 2013, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to four years' probation, unanimously reversed, on the law, defendant's motion to suppress granted, and the indictment dismissed.
As the People concede, defendant is entitled to suppression because the hearing evidence did not establish a sufficient basis for a search of a closed container incident to defendant's arrest, under the principles set forth in People v Jimenez (22 NY2d 717 [2014], which was decided after defendant's conviction.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 5, 2017
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.