Matter of Herbin v Stolz

Annotate this Case
Matter of Herbin v Stolz 2017 NY Slip Op 08099 Decided on November 16, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 16, 2017
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Andrias, Kern, Oing, JJ.
4986 2754/16 -4953] 121/17

[*1]In re Reginald Herbin, Petitioner,

v

Hon. Robert Stolz, et al., Respondents.



Reginald Herbin, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Angel Guardiola II of counsel), for Hon. Robert Stolz and Hon. Jill Konviser, respondents.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ross D. Mazer of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Michael Mulanphy, respondents.



The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 16, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.