People v Nelson

Annotate this Case
People v Nelson 2017 NY Slip Op 07946 Decided on November 14, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 14, 2017
Friedman, J.P., Kapnick, Webber, Gesmer, Oing, JJ.
4575/13 4927A 957/15 4927

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Latik Nelson, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (David Bernstein of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Hope Korenstein of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered May 31, 2016,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 14, 2017

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.