People v Goldman

Annotate this Case
People v Goldman 2017 NY Slip Op 08189 Decided on November 21, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 21, 2017
Acosta, P.J., Tom, Webber, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.
1572/10 -3986/10 -1441/11 1380/13 5007B 5007A 5007

[*1]5007C The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Reginald Goldman, Defendant-Appellant.



Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Molly Ryan of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Jordan K. Hummel of counsel), for respondent.



Judgments of resentence, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), rendered March 28, 2016, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

In this resentencing pursuant to People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497 [2013]), the court providently exercised its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment. The seriousness of defendant's multiple violent crimes, including, among other

things, shooting two victims in the back, outweighed the allegedly mitigating factors asserted by defendant.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 21, 2017

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.