Riley v Vance

Annotate this Case
Riley v Vance 2016 NY Slip Op 06971 Decided on October 25, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

mem

ad1

Riley v Vance

2016

ny

06971

2028 4647/15 -455

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 25, 2016


Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Webber, JJ.


2028 4647/15 -455



[*1] & In re Dwayne Riley

Petitioner,

Cyrus R. Vance, etc., et al.,

Respondents.



Dwayne Riley, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Ryan Gee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Eric T. Schneiderman, respondent.





The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the

same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 25, 2016

CLERK



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.