New York Urban Dev. Corp. v P.G. Singh Enters., LLC

Annotate this Case
New York Urban Dev. Corp. v P.G. Singh Enters., LLC 2013 NY Slip Op 07696 Decided on November 19, 2013 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on November 19, 2013
Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman, JJ. 11130N-
450095/12 11130NA

[*1]In re New York Urban Development Corporation, etc., Petitioner-Respondent,

v

P.G. Singh Enterprises, LLC, et al., Respondents-Appellants.




Berkman, Henoch, Peterson, Peddy & Fenchel, P.C., Garden
City (Daniel M. Lehmann of counsel), for appellants.
Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, New York (John R. Casolaro
of counsel), for respondent.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 28, 2013, which granted condemnees P.G. Singh Enterprises, LLC's and Parminder Kaur and Amanji Kaur's motions for an extension of time to file appraisal reports, on condition that the interest on their claims cease to accrue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion when it suspended the accrual of interest on the condemnees' claims during the extension of time they sought for the completion of their
appraisal reports (see e.g. Abele v State of New York, 39 Misc 3d 1240[A] [Ct Cl 2011]; see also Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 514[b]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: NOVEMBER 19, 2013

CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.