People v Lopez
Annotate this Case
People v Lopez
2011 NY Slip Op 09016
Decided on December 15, 2011
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 15, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
6340 2526/03
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Richard Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Decided on December 15, 2011
Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
6340 2526/03
[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Richard Lopez, Defendant-Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York
(Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alan Gadlin
of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered July 14, 2010, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of seven years, with five years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.
ENTERED: DECEMBER 15, 2011
CLERK
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
