Sloan v Edes

Annotate this Case
Sloan v Edes 2010 NY Slip Op 06469 [76 AD3d 485] August 24, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Samuel H. Sloan, Appellant,
v
Chris Edes, Respondent. Samuel H. Sloan, Appellant, v Warren Redlich et al., Respondents, and Mark Axinn, Respondent.

—[*1] Samuel H. Sloan, appellant pro se.

Mark N. Axinn, New York, respondent pro se.

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered on or about May 26, 2010 and July 12, 2010, and said appeals having been argued by the respective parties; and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is unanimously ordered that the orders so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated by Edmead, J., without costs or disbursements. Concur—Freedman, J.P., Richter, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels and RomÁn, JJ. (Entered August 17, 2010.)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.