Matter of Shelia B. v Shirelle Jasmine B.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Shelia B. v Shirelle Jasmine B. 2009 NY Slip Op 08697 [67 AD3d 610] November 24, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010

In the Matter of Shelia B., Appellant,
v
Shirelle Jasmine B., Respondent, and Administration for Children's Services, Respondent.

—[*1] John J. Marafino, Mount Vernon, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jane L. Gordon of counsel), for Administration for Children's Services, respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Patricia Colella of counsel), Law Guardian.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Jennifer Burtt, Ref.), entered on or about March 19, 2008, which dismissed the petition of appellant grandmother for custody of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of the mother's surrender of parental rights and the child's adoption, the court properly dismissed the custody petition (see Matter of Linda S. v Krishnia S., 50 AD3d 805, 806 [2008]; Matter of Moorhead v Coss, 17 AD3d 725 [2005]). Although petitioner, the child's maternal grandmother, asserts that the court should have converted the custody petition to one for visitation, her counsel never expressly requested that the custody petition be treated as an application for visitation, nor did the petition request visitation. Indeed, the petition provided virtually no information about petitioner's relationship with her grandson, other than that she is his grandmother and that he resided with her for three months in 2005 (see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178, 182 [1991]). Under the circumstances, the court was not required to [*2]treat petitioner's counsel's oral inquiry about visitation as a formal application (see Moorhead, 17 AD3d at 726). We take note however that petitioner is free to file a petition for visitation at any time. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, DeGrasse and Roman, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.