Gomez v 2355 Eighth Ave., LLC

Annotate this Case
Gomez v 2355 Eighth Ave., LLC 2007 NY Slip Op 09498 [45 AD3d 493] November 29, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Orsines Gomez, Respondent,
v
2355 Eighth Avenue, LLC, Appellant.

—[*1] Doyle & Broumand, LLP, Bronx (Michael B. Doyle of counsel), for appellant.

Friedman, Friedman, Chiaravalloti & Giannini, New York City (A. Joseph Giannini of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered on or about July 10, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was injured when a temporary platform of plywood pieces laid across floor beams gave way under his weight, dropping him between the beams to shoulder level, with his feet dangling in the air above the basement floor. His uncontroverted deposition testimony established defendant's liability for providing an unsafe, elevated device within the meaning of section 240 (1) (see Campisi v Epos Contr. Corp., 299 AD2d 4 [2002]; Becerra v City of New York, 261 AD2d 188 [1999]). The fact that the job site supervisor, who did not witness the accident, did not see the hazardous condition after the accident does not warrant denial of the cross motion. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.