People v Lamberty

Annotate this Case
People v Lamberty 2007 NY Slip Op 09487 [45 AD3d 486] November 29, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Ricardo Lamberty, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Seon Jeong Lee of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Bryan C. Hughes of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about March 17, 2006, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender and sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant received effective assistance of counsel at his classification hearing. It is undisputed that the court correctly assessed 150 points, which is well over the threshold for a level three adjudication. Even if we were to find that counsel's downward departure argument inappropriately failed to address relevant factors, we would find that defendant was not prejudiced in any manner, since there is no indication that any special circumstances existed that would warrant such a departure (see People v Douglas, 18 AD3d 967, 968 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]; see also People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.