Matter of Ball v Kelly
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of William Ball, Appellant,
v
Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund, Article II, et al., Respondents.
—[*1]Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered September 19, 2005, denying the petition and dismissing this CPLR article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It cannot be determined, as matter of law, that the disability was a natural and proximate result of a service-related accident (see Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 60 NY2d 347 [1983]). While petitioner's hearing loss did result from an acute injury, the record supports the finding that he was performing routine duties at the time of his injury (see e.g. Matter of McDonald v Regan, 174 AD2d 940 [1991], lv denied 78 NY2d 859 [1991]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Friedman and McGuire, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.