People v Mackie

Annotate this Case
People v Mackie 2006 NY Slip Op 07606 [33 AD3d 490] October 24, 2006 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 13, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Coydine Mackie, Appellant.

—[*1]Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ruth Pickholz, J.), entered on or about May 17, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the level three sex offender adjudication, which was based upon defendant's prior felony sex crime conviction, a presumptive overriding factor under the applicable guidelines (see People v Judd, 29 AD3d 431 [2006]). The court properly concluded that defendant's present circumstances did not warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]).

Defendant's arguments concerning the choice of risk factors made by the Legislature and the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (see Correction Law § 168-l [5]) are without merit (see People v Joe, 26 AD3d 300 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 703 [2006]; see also People v Bligen, 33 AD3d 489; [2006] [decided herewith]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Sullivan and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.