Duane Reade v Snapper Realty LLC

Annotate this Case
Duane Reade v Snapper Realty LLC 2005 NY Slip Op 10022 [24 AD3d 262] December 22, 2005 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Duane Reade et al., Appellants,
v
Snapper Realty LLC et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered June 10, 2004, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Because plaintiffs failed to raise any material issues of fact in response to the prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment made by defendants, the court properly granted summary judgment (Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). In writing a letter to the Department of Buildings objecting to the issuance of building permits to plaintiffs, defendants merely were pursuing their economic interest and did not act at all improperly. Indeed, the Department subsequently agreed with certain objections raised in the letter to plaintiffs' building plans. Plaintiffs wholly failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to its claims that defendants acted tortiously in submitting the letter. We have considered and rejected plaintiffs' remaining arguments. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.