Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v Johnny Anglero

Annotate this Case
Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v Anglero 2004 NY Slip Op 09685 [13 AD3d 281] December 28, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Martin Motor Sales, Inc., Appellant,
v
Johnny Anglero, Respondent.

—[*1]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 30, 2004, denying the petition to vacate the arbitration award and granting respondent's cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to the Used Car Lemon Law (General Business Law § 198-b), the court properly found that the award was rational and the evidence sufficiently supported the arbitrator's finding in respondent's favor (see Mount St. Mary's Hosp. v Catherwood, 26 NY2d 493, 508 [1970]). The record indicates that the same problems existed with respondent's vehicle for more than three repair attempts by petitioner within the statutory period. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.