Margaret Peyton v State of Newburgh, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Peyton v State of Newburgh, Inc.
2004 NY Slip Op 09211
Decided on December 14, 2004
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 14, 2004
Andrias, J.P., Lerner, Marlow, Catterson, JJ.
4880
[*1]Margaret Peyton, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant,
v
State of Newburgh, Inc., et al., Defendants, Epic Realty, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Respondents.
Leahey & Johnson, P.C., New York (James P. Tenney of
counsel), for appellants-respondents.
Debrot & Siris, P.C., New York (Jacques L. Debrot of counsel),
for respondent-appellant.
Decided on December 14, 2004
Andrias, J.P., Lerner, Marlow, Catterson, JJ.
4880
[*1]Margaret Peyton, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant,
v
State of Newburgh, Inc., et al., Defendants, Epic Realty, LLC, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Respondents.
Leahey & Johnson, P.C., New York (James P. Tenney of
counsel), for appellants-respondents.
Debrot & Siris, P.C., New York (Jacques L. Debrot of counsel),
for respondent-appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered April 19, 2004, modified, on the law, defendants-appellants-respondents' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants-appellants-respondents dismissing the complaint as against them.
Opinion by Lerner, J. All concur.
Order filed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
