Salvatore Marino v Ruben Vega

Annotate this Case
Marino v Vega 2004 NY Slip Op 08817 [12 AD3d 329] November 30, 2004 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Salvatore Marino, as Administrator of the Estate of Olga Nunez, Deceased, Appellant,
v
Ruben Vega et al., Defendants, and The New York Times Company et al., Respondents.

—[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered June 1, 2004, which granted the corporate defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Tri-State had a contract with defendant Times to distribute the latter's newspapers. Defendant Vega had an independent contract with Tri-State to deliver these papers, giving him sole responsibility and control over the manner and means of providing this service. Tri-State did not exercise sufficient control over the actual delivery process to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether it was vicariously liable for Vega's acts (Santella v Andrews, 266 AD2d 62 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 762 [2000]). The Independent Contractor Deliverer Agreement required that the newspapers be delivered each day by a certain time and in undamaged condition. This showed nothing more than the most general supervisory control, and could not be the basis for imposing liability against the corporate defendants for the acts of the independent contractor (Santella v Andrews, supra; see also Lazo v Mak's Trading Co., 84 NY2d 896 [1994], affg 199 AD2d 165 [1993]).

Vega, who was on his way to work and had pulled his vehicle into a gas station to put air in a tire when his vehicle struck the decedent, was not acting within the scope of his employment [*2]at the time of the accident. The corporate defendants had no control over Vega's activities at that moment (Lundberg v State of New York, 25 NY2d 467 [1969]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman and Catterson, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.