Davis v. Davis

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 KIMBERLY DAVIS, 3 Petitioner-Appellee, 4 v. No. A-1-CA-36806 5 DONNIS DAVIS, 6 Respondent-Appellant. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY 8 Drew D. Tatum, District Judge 9 Greig & Richards, P.A. 10 William H. Greig 11 Clovis, NM 12 for Appellee 13 Harmon Barnett Morris, P.C. 14 Jared Morris 15 Clovis, NM 16 for Appellant 17 18 ZAMORA, Judge. MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 4 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 WE CONCUR: 8 ____________________________ 9 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 10 ____________________________ 11 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge _______________________________ M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.