Palacios v. Palacios
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. 1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 REFUGIA PALACIOS, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. A-1-CA-36324 5 PEDRO PALACIOS, 6 Defendant-Appellant, 7 and 8 9 10 11 12 LINDAS INVERSIONES, INC.; JOSE LUIS PALACIOS; WILLIAM MARTINEZ d/b/a ROADRUNNER CONSTRUCTION; and LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, Defendants. 13 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 14 Darren M. Kugler, District Judge 15 Samuel Isaiah Kane 16 Las Cruces, NM 17 for Appellee 18 Pedro Palacios 19 Elk Grove, CA 1 Pro Se Appellant 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION 3 VANZI, Chief Judge. 4 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 5 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 6 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 7 {2} AFFIRMED. 8 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 __________________________________ LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 11 WE CONCUR: 12 _________________________________ 13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 14 _________________________________ 15 JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
