MARK LAFRANCO v. AVAYA, INC.

Annotate this Case

 

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY

A- 78 September Term 2007

61,871


MARK LAFRANCO,


Plaintiff-Respondent,


v.


AVAYA, INC.,


Defendant-Appellant,


and


PATRICK IRACA,


Defendant.



This matter having come before the Court on the motion of defendant Avaya, Inc., pursuant to Rule 2:2-2(b), for leave to appeal the July 13, 2007 order of the Appellate Division granting the motion of plaintiff Mark LaFranco to disqualify the law firm of Fisher & Phillips from further representation of either defendant or Patrick Iraca;1

And the Court having granted defendant s motion for leave to appeal, 193 N.J. 271 (2007);

And defendant having represented that Kevin C. Donovan, Esq., of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, has been separately retained to represent, and has entered his appearance on behalf of, Patrick Iraca, and that such separate representation will continue through the present appeal before the Appellate Division and, if so ordered, any retrial of the underlying lawsuit filed by plaintiff;

And the Court having heard argument on defendant s appeal on March 10, 2008;

And good cause appearing;

IT IS ORDERED that the July 13, 2007 order of the Appellate Division granting plaintiff s motion to disqualify the law firm of Fisher & Phillips from further representation of defendant is summarily reversed, and the cause is remanded to the Appellate Division for prosecution of defendant s pending appeal and plaintiff s pending cross-appeal; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall file its brief on the merits before the Appellate Division within thirty days from the date of this order.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

WITNESS, the Honorable Stuart Rabner, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 11th day of March, 2008.

/s/ Stephen W. Townsend

Clerk of the Supreme Court

 

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO, and HOENS join in the Court's Order.

1 The Appellate Division s July 13, 2007 order also extended the time for defendant to file its brief on the merits in the Appellate Division.


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.