In Re Perwin

Annotate this Case

60 N.J. 174 (1972)

287 A.2d 3

IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY J. PERWIN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 11, 1972.

Decided February 7, 1972.

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for the order.

Mr. Stanley J. Perwin, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, State v. Yormark, 117 N.J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N.J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

At the oral argument respondent stated that he intended promptly to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN 7.

Opposed None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.