State v. PROBASCO
Annotate this Case58 N.J. 372 (1971)
277 A.2d 546
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY THE COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ETHEL W. PROBASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 10, 1971.
Decided May 24, 1971.
Mr. Ralph S. Heuser, Jr., argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Heuser & Heuser, attorneys).
Mr. David A. Biederman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion in the Appellate Division, 114 N.J. Super. 546 (1970).
*373 For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN 7.
For reversal None.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
