JERSEY RONILSON v. BEAZER HOMES CORPORATION

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3.

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

RONILSON CARLOS INACIO

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BEAZER HOMES CORPORATION,

PRO BUILD COMPANY, LLC, and

PRO BUILD NORTHEAST, LLC,

Defendants-Respondents,

and

EXCEL CONTRACTORS, LLC, and

NEW HOMES CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________

December 20, 2016

Submitted December 13, 2016 Decided

Before Judges Messano, Guadagno, and Suter.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L-4442-13.

Feldman, Shepherd, Wohlgelernter, Tanner, Weinstock & Dodig, LLP, attorneys for appellant (John M. Dodig and Jason A. Daria, on the brief).

Fox Rothschild LLP and Nicholas S. Salter (Fox Rothschild LLP) of the Pennsylvania and Georgia bars, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys for respondent Beazer Homes Corporation (Stephanie B. Fineman and Mr. Salter, on the brief).

Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., attorneys for respondents Pro Build Company, LLC and Pro Build Northeast, LLC (Michael A. Kosar, on the brief).

Stark & Stark, P.C., attorneys for amicus curiae New Jersey Association for Justice (Bruce H. Stern and Michael G. Donahue, of counsel; Evan J. Lide, Domenic B. Sanginiti, Jr., and David M. Schmid, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.