State v. Lee
Annotate this CasePursuant to a plea bargain, Defendant was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to a term of seventy years to life in prison. The Supreme Court summarily affirmed. Defendant filed a motion for postconviction relief, alleging violations of his right to speedy trial, to due process, and to effective assistance of counsel. The district court denied the motion without a hearing. The Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s order in part but reversed and remanded with regard to Defendant’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert his speedy trial rights. On remand, the district court denied Defendant’s motion for postconviction relief, concluding that Defendant’s right to a speedy trial was not violated and that the continuances sought by counsel for Defendant were sought only after counsel obtained Defendant’s verbal consent. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did not err in any of its findings.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.