Golnick v. Callender
Annotate this CaseJan Golnick filed a complaint alleging that he sustained injuries as a direct and proximate result of a crash with the vehicle driven by Jack Callender. Callender admitted in his answer that he was negligent in causing the vehicle accident that injured Golnick. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court did commit prejudicial error in (1) denying Golnick’s request to amend his complaint to allege specific acts of tortious conduct; (2) sustaining Callender’s motion to prohibit Golnick from presenting evidence of Callender’s negligence at trial; and (3) rejecting three of Golnick’s proposed jury instructions.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.