State v. Sikes
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded guilty to driving under the influence, third offense. In sentencing and sanctioning Defendant, the district court (1) sentenced Defendant to one year imprisonment with one day's credit for time served; (2) fined Defendant; (3) revoked Defendant's driver's license for fifteen years; and (4) ordered that, if Defendant chose to drive, he obtain an ignition interlock permit, install an interlock device on each motor vehicle he operates, and utilize a continuous alcohol monitoring (CAM) device for the entire fifteen-year revocation. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding (1) the district court did not err in ordering Defendant to use a CAM device; (2) the district court did not err in stating in its written order that Defendant must abstain from alcohol use during the interlock revocation period; and (3) the sentence and sanctions imposed were not an abuse of discretion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.