In re A.K.
Annotate this CaseIn 2014, the Department of Public Health and Human Services (Department) filed a petition for termination of Father’s parental rights to his two children. After a termination hearing, the district court determined that clear and convincing evidence supported terminating Father’s parental rights. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court (1) did not abuse its discretion in terminating Father’s parental rights, as the court based its decision on clear and convincing evidence and properly applied the legal standards governing termination; and (2) did not err in concluding that the Department complied with its statutory duty to provide reunification services.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.