Larsen v. Richardson
Annotate this CaseThe Larsens, plaintiffs, commenced an action seeking to quiet title to a 26.96-acre parcel of land. The Richardsons, defendants, counterclaimed that they held an easement by prescription over a portion of that land. Subsequently, the Richardsons amended their counterclaim to allege they owned the northernmost 9.74 acres of the parcel outright, retaining their easement theory as an alternative ground for relief. The district court (1) ruled that the Larsens owned the entire 26.96 acres and that the Richardsons did not hold a prescriptive easement, and (2) awarded some of the Larsens' requested costs and denied their request for attorney's fees in its entirety. The Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding (1) the district court did not err in determining that the Larsens owned the disputed 9.74 acres; (2) the district court did not err in determining that the Richardsons did not hold a prescriptive easement; (3) the district court did not err in denying the Larsens' request for attorney's fees; and (4) the district court erred in denying the Larsens' request for costs for the reasonable expenses incurred in preparing additional maps and surveys for purposes of trial. Remanded.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.