Ronnie Carl Gilner vs. State of MS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 96-KP-00056-SCT
RONNIE CARL GILNER
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED,
PURSUANT TO M.R.A.P. 35-A
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
06/09/95
HON. KOSTA VLAHOS
STONE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
PRO SE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: CHARLES W. MARIS, JR.
CONO CARANNA
CRIMINAL - POST CONVICTION RELIEF
AFFIRMED - 8/7/97
10/16/97
BEFORE PRATHER, P.J., ROBERTS AND MILLS, JJ.
ROBERTS, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Ronnie Carl Gilner appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief. On November 23,
1983, Gilner was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility
of parole. Gilner did not appeal his conviction.
On September 15, 1993, Gilner filed a motion for post-conviction relief which was denied by Stone
County Circuit Court on June 14, 1995, because the request was time barred. On June 22, 1995,
Gilner filed a motion to alter or amend judgment and allow him to proceed with an out-of-time
appeal. On January 8, 1996, the Stone County Circuit Court denied the motion as time barred. On
January 18, 1996, Gilner filed this appeal. Aggrieved by the disposition below, Gilner requests review
of the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN DENYING GILNER'S MOTION TO
ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT?
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On November 23, 1983, Ronnie Carl Gilner was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life
imprisonment with the possibility of parole. Gilner did not appeal the conviction and sentence.
Almost a decade later, on September 15, 1993, Gilner filed a motion for post-conviction relief.
On January 23, 1995, Gilner filed a request with the Stone County Circuit Court for leave to file an
out-of-time appeal. Gilner's alleged that his trial counsel advised him not to appeal the conviction
because he would be subjected to the death penalty, and he therefore was entitled to an out-of-time
appeal. Further, Gilner asked the circuit court to substitute this motion for the previously filed postconviction relief motion. On June 14, 1995, Circuit Court Judge Kosta Vlahos entered an order that
denied Gilner's post-conviction relief request because it was time barred pursuant to Miss. Code Ann.
§ 99-39-5 (2).
On June 22, 1995, Gilner filed a motion to alter or amend judgment, in which Gilner stated that his
earlier motion for an out-of-time appeal should be denied. Gilner contended that he had asked the
circuit court to dismiss the post-conviction relief motion filed September 15, 1993, and therefore the
circuit court lacked jurisdiction to enter the June 14, 1995, order that denied his post-conviction
relief request. On January 5, 1996, Judge Kosta Vlahos entered an order that denied Gilner's motion
to alter or amend judgment. On January 12, 1996, Gilner filed this appeal.
DISCUSSION
I. WHETHER THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN DENYING GILNER'S MOTION TO
ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT?
Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5 (2) states that a motion for post-conviction relief must be made within
three (3) years after the entry of judgment or conviction. Additionally, this Court has stated that an
individual convicted prior to April 17, 1984, had three years from April 17, 1984, to file their petition
for post-conviction relief. Luckett v. State, 582 So. 2d 428, 430 (Miss. 1991). Luckett was convicted
of forcible rape in 1980, however, he did not file any motion in the matter until 1989. Id. at 429.
Similar to the case at bar, Luckett alleged that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing because of
ineffective assistance of counsel. Id. This Court stated, "Luckett's application was filed more than
nine (9) years subsequent to the entry of his guilty pleas. No appeal or other pleading for relief was
filed by him prior to the application presented, and no exceptions to this procedural bar are
applicable. Id. at 430.
In the case sub judice, Gilner filed his first motion for post-conviction relief almost ten years after the
entry of judgment. Gilner's allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel is not supported by the
record, nor does it fall under the exceptions from the three year statute of limitations. Gilner's postconviction relief claim based on ineffective assistance of counsel is time barred pursuant to Miss.
Code Ann. § 99-39-5 (2).
CONCLUSION
Miss. Code Ann. 99-39-5 (2) states that a motion for post-conviction relief shall be filed within three
years after the entry of judgment or conviction. Gilner did not appeal his 1983 capital murder
conviction and waited almost ten years before filing his first motion for post-conviction relief. Gilner
contends that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing because of ineffective assistance of counsel.
However, Gilner's contentions do not fall within the exceptions to Miss. Code Ann. § 99-39-5 (2)
and therefore, the lower court's order denying Gilner's motion is affirmed.
LOWER COURT'S DENIAL OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF AFFIRMED.
LEE, C.J., PRATHER AND SULLIVAN, P.JJ., PITTMAN, BANKS, McRAE, SMITH AND
MILLS, JJ., CONCUR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
