Tracey Tyrone Isaac a/k/a Tracey Isaac a/k/a Tracey T. Isaac a/k/a Tracy Tyrone Isaac v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CP-00700-COA TRACEY TYRONE ISAAC A/K/A TRACEY ISAAC A/K/A TRACEY T. ISAAC A/K/A TRACY TYRONE ISAAC APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: TRIAL JUDGE: COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: NATURE OF THE CASE: TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION: DISPOSITION: MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: APPELLEE 04/08/2015 HON. DAVID H. STRONG JR. PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT TRACEY TYRONE ISAAC (PRO SE) OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: JEFFREY A. KLINGFUSS CIVIL - POST-CONVICTION RELIEF DENIED APPELLANT’S REQUESTS TO ALTER BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND ISSUE SUMMONSES AFFIRMED: 06/21/2016 BEFORE GRIFFIS, P.J., ISHEE AND WILSON, JJ. GRIFFIS, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶1. In 2012, Tracey Isaac was indicted for the unlawful sale of at least one-tenth gram but less than two grams of cocaine within 1,500 feet of a church, as a habitual offender. Miss. Code Ann. §§ 41-29-139 (Supp. 2015), 41-29-142 (Rev. 2013), and 99-19-81 (Rev. 2015). He later pleaded guilty to the unlawful-sale charge, and the State did not move forward on the habitual-offender portion of the indictment. Isaac was sentenced to thirty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with fifteen years to serve and fifteen years suspended, followed by five years of post-release supervision. ¶2. Isaac’s request for relief is unclear. The brief submitted to this Court contains no request for relief, and the statements do not place any appealable issues before the Court. Additionally, the record consists almost exclusively of Isaac’s own handwritten motions and exhibits; the circuit court found these documents “largely nonsensical.” ¶3. The circuit court filed two orders responding to Isaac’s latest filings. The first order, filed on April 6, 2015, dismissed Isaac’s request that the court allow him to change the race listed on his birth certificate to “Moorish American.” The second order, filed April 8, 2015, denied a motion in which Isaac requested that the court allow him to issue summonses for a civil suit that he thought he filed against the Mississippi Parole and Probation Office. It is not clear from which order Isaac purports to appeal. “[This Court] cannot discern from the collection of documents any issue cognizable of appellate review.” Graves v. State, 918 So. 2d 791, 792 (¶4) (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). ¶4. Isaac’s brief also mentions various docket numbers that, if in existence, are not included in this appeal. He discusses various issues that he has placed before the courts below, including motions regarding forfeitures of property, requests to change his birth certificate, and claims of identity theft and extortion. ¶5. “It is the duty of the appellant to state with some particularity the facts forming the basis for his contentions, including a citation to the portion of the record where those facts may be discovered.” Owens v. State, 869 So. 2d 1047, 1051 (¶18) (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). Further, “Rule 28 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that the brief of the appellant 2 shall contain a statement of the issues presented for review.” Graves, 918 So. 2d at 792 (¶5). ¶6. Because Isaac has failed to present any issues properly before this Court on appeal, has not presented any particular facts to support his assertions, and has not requested any particular relief, we affirm the circuit court’s orders denying relief. ¶7. THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PIKE COUNTY IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO PIKE COUNTY. LEE, C.J., IRVING, P.J., BARNES, ISHEE, CARLTON, FAIR, JAMES, WILSON AND GREENLEE, JJ., CONCUR. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
