Andrea Diane McKay v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 2010-KA-00733-COA
ANDREA DIANE MCKAY
APPELLANT
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
APPELLEE
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
11/18/2009
HON. JOHN C. GARGIULO
HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
LESLIE S. LEE
BENJAMIN ALLEN SUBER
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: BILLY L. GORE
CONO A. CARANNA II
CRIMINAL - FELONY
CONVICTED OF MURDER AND
SENTENCED TO LIFE IN THE CUSTODY
OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS
AFFIRMED - 04/12/2011
BEFORE LEE, C.J., BARNES AND MAXWELL, JJ.
LEE, C.J., FOR THE COURT:
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶1.
Andrea Diane McKay was convicted in the Harrison County Circuit Court of murder
and sentenced to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections.
¶2.
McKay filed a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, which
was denied by the trial court.
McKay now appeals, asserting that the evidence was
insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. McKay seeks to be resentenced for manslaughter
or, in the alternative, granted a new trial. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
¶3.
McKay and Vincent Weathersby, the victim, have two children together, and the
couple had been in an on-again-off-again relationship for three years. Although they had
separated, McKay and Weathersby lived across the street from one another in Gulfport,
Mississippi. They rented houses from the same landlord.
¶4.
According to McKay, she saw Weathersby in his driveway on April 21, 2008, and
went to ask him if their eight-year-old daughter was at his house. McKay and Weathersby
began arguing. McKay accused Weathersby of talking about her to their landlord. McKay
testified that she was standing on the passenger’s side of Weathersby’s van, and Weathersby
was sitting in the driver’s seat. According to McKay, Weathersby came around to the
passenger’s side of the van, pushed McKay to the ground, and ordered her to get out of his
yard. McKay’s sixteen-year-old daughter got involved in the altercation. McKay claims that
she became angry because Weathersby hit her daughter in the face. McKay ran across the
street to her house and returned with a two-prong barbecue fork in her hand. She intended
to stab Weathersby with the fork, but she punctured one of Weathersby’s tires instead.
McKay then ran back to her house. She returned to Weathersby’s yard once again and
picked up a steak knife off the ground near Weathersby’s van. Weathersby was standing in
the doorway to his house when McKay came at him with the knife. She stated her intention
was to cut him, but she unintentionally stabbed him in the neck. She ran back to her house.
2
Weathersby also ran toward McKay’s house, but he collapsed in the street. Weathersby
stayed in the hospital for ten days before dying as a result of the stab wound to his neck.
¶5.
McKay turned herself in to the police the day after the stabbing.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
¶6.
Our standard of review in regard to challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence is
well settled. “[T]he critical inquiry is whether the evidence shows ‘beyond a reasonable
doubt that accused committed the act charged, and that he did so under such circumstances
that every element of the offense existed[.]’” Bush v. State, 895 So. 2d 836, 843 (¶16) (Miss.
2005) (citation omitted). If, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, any
rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the essential elements
of the crime existed, this Court will affirm the conviction. Id. However, it is well-settled law
that the jury determines the credibility of witnesses and resolves conflicts in the evidence.
Davis v. State, 866 So. 2d 1107, 1112 (¶17) (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
DISCUSSION
¶7.
McKay argues that she acted in the heat of passion; thus, the evidence supported a
conviction of manslaughter rather than murder.
¶8.
The jury was instructed on both murder and heat-of-passion manslaughter.
¶9.
Manslaughter is defined in Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-35 (Rev. 2006)
as follows:
The killing of a human being, without malice, in the heat of passion, but in a
cruel or unusual manner, or by the use of a dangerous weapon, without
authority of law, and not in necessary self-defense, shall be manslaughter.
¶10.
Murder is defined in Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-3-19 (Rev. 2006) as
3
follows:
(1) The killing of a human being without the authority of law by any means or
in any manner shall be murder in the following cases:
(a) When done with deliberate design to effect the death of the
person killed, or of any human being;
(b) When done in the commission of an act eminently dangerous
to others and evincing a depraved heart, regardless of human
life, although without any premeditated design to effect the
death of any particular individual . . . .
¶11.
McKay admits that she intentionally stabbed Weathersby, but she argues that she did
not act with deliberate design to kill him. She states that she was angry at Weathersby for
hitting her daughter in the face, but she did not want to kill Weathersby, as he was the father
of two of her children. The State’s position is that ample time had passed between the
argument and the stabbing for the jury to find that McKay had acted with deliberate design.
¶12.
Leonard Bankston, Weathersby’s friend, testified for the State. He testified that after
the initial argument between McKay and Weathersby, McKay and her daughter returned to
McKay’s house. McKay then returned to Weathersby’s yard and slashed his tire. Bankston
estimated that two-and-one-half to three minutes passed between the time McKay went back
to her house until she slashed Weathersby’s tire. He testified that McKay then ran back to
her house and spoke to her daughter and boyfriend before running back to Weathersby’s
house with a knife in her hand. He estimated that two to three minutes passed between these
events. Bankston testified that when McKay arrived at Weathersby’s door, Weathersby was
knelt down hugging his son and facing the inside of his house. Bankston saw something
shiny in McKay’s hand and yelled, “Vincent, watch out.” Bankston stated that he saw
4
McKay make one stabbing motion with the knife before she ran back to her house. Bankston
testified that, contrary to McKay’s and her daughter’s testimony, he did not see Weathersby
strike McKay’s daughter in any way.
¶13.
Inekia Johnson, McKay’s daughter, testified that Weathersby hit her approximately
five times and pulled her hair. Johnson testified that Weathersby also hit McKay until she
fell to the ground, and then he got on top of her and hit her with both of his hands.
¶14.
Dr. Paul McGarry, a forensic pathologist, testified that Weathersby exhibited a
diagonal wound consistent with being stabbed with a knife blade from an overhead motion.
Dr. McGarry opined that Weathersby had died from blood loss and blood accumulation in
his lungs caused by the knife wound. Dr. McGarry found no scratches or bruises on
Weathersby’s hands.
¶15.
“Whether a homicide is classified as a murder or manslaughter is ordinarily an inquiry
to be made by the jury.” Hodge v. State, 823 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (¶16) (Miss. 2002). Viewing
the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we find that the essential elements of
the crime of murder were sufficiently proven such that a jury could find McKay guilty
beyond reasonable doubt. The jury heard conflicting evidence regarding the altercation
between McKay and Weathersby. The jury also heard that several minutes had passed
between the initial argument and the stabbing. In order to find McKay guilty of murder, the
jury had to determine that she had acted with deliberate design or in a way that was
“eminently dangerous to others and evincing a depraved heart . . . .” Miss. Code Ann. § 973-19(1)(a)-(b). We find that the jury’s decision was supported by the evidence. This issue
is without merit.
5
¶16. THE JUDGMENT OF THE HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF
CONVICTION OF MURDER AND SENTENCE OF LIFE IN THE CUSTODY OF
THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IS AFFIRMED. ALL
COSTS OF THIS APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO HARRISON COUNTY.
IRVING AND GRIFFIS, P.JJ., MYERS, BARNES, ISHEE, ROBERTS,
CARLTON AND MAXWELL, JJ., CONCUR.
6
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
