Felix Graham v. State of Mississippi
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 1998-KA-01148-COA
FELIX GRAHAM
v.
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF TRIAL COURT
JUDGMENT:
TRIAL JUDGE:
COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
TRIAL COURT DISPOSITION:
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
06/23/1998
HON. JOHN L. HATCHER
BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
BOYD P. ATKINSON
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: SCOTT STEWART
LAURENCE Y. MELLEN
CRIMINAL - FELONY
COUNT I AGGRAVATED ASSAULT: SENTENCED TO
SERVE A TERM OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT
THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE AND COUNT II
POSSESSION OF A FIREARM BY A CONVICTED
FELON AND SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT
WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE TO RUN
CONCURRENTLY WITH SENTENCE IN COUNT I
AFFIRMED - 04/02/2002
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
CERTIORARI FILED:
; denied 9/5/2002
MANDATE ISSUED:
4/23/2002
BEFORE SOUTHWICK, P.J., LEE, AND CHANDLER, JJ.
CHANDLER, J., FOR THE COURT:
¶1. Appellant Felix Graham was indicted by a Bolivar County grand jury for aggravated assault and
possession of a deadly weapon by a convicted felon. Following a trial, the jury found Graham guilty of the
crimes charged. At the sentencing, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to section 99-19-83 of the
Mississippi Code and determined that Graham was a habitual, violent offender and sentenced him to life
imprisonment on both counts without the possibility of parole. Aggrieved, Graham appeals, arguing that the
trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict or, in the alternative, a new trial.
FACTS
¶2. On June 4, 1997, at approximately two o'clock in the morning, Danny Johnson had his cousin drop him
off at the intersection of Glasco and Crisham Streets in Cleveland, Mississippi. Several bars and a barber
shop bordered the intersection, making it a popular place of late night congregation. The intersection had a
reputation as a place for gang activity, including drugs and gunfire.
¶3. After his cousin dropped him off, Danny found his girlfriend, Janet Norris, and began talking with her.
As Norris was leaving, Danny noticed Felix Graham appear from behind one of the nearby buildings.
According to Danny, Graham had a gun and began firing in his direction. Danny attempted to run from
Graham; however, the chase ended when a beige vehicle pulled up, stopping Danny in the middle of the
intersection. Graham grabbed onto Danny and shot him twice through the top of his head. As a result,
Danny was paralyzed on his left side and lost all hearing in his right ear.
¶4. Two other witnesses testified that Graham was responsible for the shooting. Gary Hodges, Danny's
brother, saw Graham come from behind the bar and begin shooting. Hodges, fearing that the bullets were
intended for him, fled the scene in his car. When he returned he saw Lenkendrik Johnson, Danny's other
brother, pulling Danny from the middle of the intersection. Lenkendrik testified that he pulled up to the
intersection right after the shooting. Lenkendrik observed his brother's body lying in the middle of the road
and Graham walking away. Lenkendrik stated that Graham was holding a gun.
¶5. Graham denied that he shot Danny. He testified that he was at his cousin's house at the time of the
shooting. Likewise, Graham denied that he possessed a firearm that night. Graham notes that the gun used
in the shooting was never recovered and there was no physical evidence linking him to either crime.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
¶6. Graham asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict or, in the alternative,
a new trial. A motion for a directed verdict challenges the legal sufficiency of evidence supporting a guilty
verdict. Adams v. State, 794 So. 2d 1049, 1058 (¶25) (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). When testing the
sufficiency of evidence, this Court accepts all evidence supporting the guilty verdict as true, affording the
State "the benefit of all favorable inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence." Wetz v.
State, 503 So. 2d 803, 808 (Miss. 1987). We will not reverse unless it is clear from the evidence that "no
reasonable, hypothetical juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty." May v.
State, 460 So.2d 778, 781 (Miss.1984).
¶7. Graham also argues that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, noting that no
physical evidence was offered against him and two alibi witnesses testified that he was not present at the
time of the shooting. An assertion that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence is
challenged in a motion for a new trial. A motion for a new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the
trial court. Neal v. State, 451 So. 2d 743, 760 (Miss. 1984). A trial court should grant a motion for new
trial only where "the verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to
stand would be to sanction an unconscionable injustice." Wetz, 503 So. 2d at 812. When we review the
trial court's denial of a motion for new trial we accept as true all evidence favoring the State and will not
reverse absent a clear abuse of discretion. Id.
¶8. Under this rigorous standard of review, we find no error. Three witnesses testified that Graham was
responsible for the shooting. According to Danny, Graham emerged from behind a nearby building with a
gun in his hand. Danny testified that he immediately began running away from Graham; however, Graham
caught Danny and shot him twice in the head. Likewise, Gary Hodges testified that he noticed Graham
come from behind the building shooting a gun. When Hodges returned to the scene, Danny was slumped
over in the middle of the street with gunshot wounds to his head. Finally, Lenkendrik Johnson stated that
when he pulled up to the scene of the shooting he observed Graham walking away from Danny who was
lying in the middle of the street. Lenkendrik Johnson asserted that Graham was carrying a gun in his hand.
¶9. Contrary to Graham's argument, the absence of physical evidence does not negate a conviction where
there is testimonial evidence. See Williams v. State, 512 So. 2d 666, 670 (Miss. 1987). Moreover, it is of
no consequence that there were minor inconsistencies in the testimonies used to support the verdict. It has
long been a rule in Mississippi that "the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility of testimony and is free
to accept or reject all or some of the testimony given by each witness." Meshell v. State, 506 So. 2d 989,
992 (Miss. 1987). See also Groseclose v. State, 440 So. 2d 297, 300 (Miss. 1983) (noting that the
weight given to testimony is not determined by the number of witnesses). We cannot conclude that the
evidence before the jury was such that all reasonable jurors could only find the accused not guilty, nor is it
apparent that the verdict was so unconscionable as to require a new trial. This assignment is without merit.
¶10. THE JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BOLIVAR COUNTY OF
CONVICTION OF COUNT I AGGRAVATED ASSAULT AND SENTENCE OF LIFE
IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE TO RUN CONSECUTIVELY
TO ANY AND ALL SENTENCES PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED; AND COUNT II POSSESSION
OF A FIREARM BY A FELON AND SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT TO RUN
CONCURRENTLY TO SENTENCE IN COUNT I, ALL IN THE CUSTODY OF THE
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IS AFFIRMED. ALL COSTS OF THIS
APPEAL ARE ASSESSED TO BOLIVAR COUNTY.
McMILLIN, C.J., KING AND SOUTHWICK, P.JJ., BRIDGES, THOMAS, LEE,
IRVING, MYERS AND BRANTLEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
