List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED March 26, 2014.

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW Filed March 26, 2014 (Petitioner indicated in Italic Type) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. State of Minnesota vs. Mpatanishi Syanaloli Tayari-Garrett A12-1915 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Charles Thomas Ortley A13-0058 Denied Leora M. Johns, Connie L. Neal vs. Maria Jacobson, et al. A13-1062 Denied Luke Joseph Freeman vs. Commissioner of Public Safety A13-0619 Denied Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA21, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-OA21 vs. Brad Everett, et al. A13-0691 Denied Federal National Mortgage Association vs. William B. Butler, Mary S. Butler, et al. A13-2301 Denied John Wesley Hebert, et al. vs. City of Fifty Lakes A13-0311 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Michael Vernon Price A13-0202 Denied Joan M. Nichols vs. State of Minnesota, Office of the Secretary of State, et al. A13-0529 Granted In re the Marriage of: Kimberly Ann Habberstad vs. Stephen Douglas Habberstad A13-0288 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Frederick Douglas Brown A13-0200 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Tommy Salyers, III A13-0597 Granted Scott Ronald Schmidt vs. Thomas P. Harlan, et al., Steven B. Nosek, et al., Defendants A13-0654 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Galuak Michael Rotgai A13-0254 Denied State of Minnesota vs. James Darrel Ober A12-2219 Denied Peter Okezie Kalu vs. State of Minnesota A13-1093 Denied State of Minnesota vs. Matthew Starnes A13-0307 Denied In re Doug Mann, Doug Mann vs. Minneapolis City Council A14-0026 Dismissed Gale A. Rachuy vs. Jeanine Pauly, et al., Duluth Police Department Property Room A13-0393, A13-0394 Denied Jim Knoblach vs. State of Minnesota A14-0344 Denied Petition for Accelerated Review State of Minnesota vs. Jason Paul Hirman A12-2030 Stay Vacated/Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.