Jill E. Hansen, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, vs. Dayton's, n/k/a Macy's, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
August 26, 2011 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A11-0432 Jill E. Hansen, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, vs. Dayton s, n/k/a Macy s, Self-Insured, Relator/Cross-Respondent, and John G. Stark, M.D., P.A., Hennepin Faculty Associates, and RS Medical, Intervenors, and Medica Health Plans, Intervenor-Respondent. ________________________________ Mark J. Freeman, Fitch, Johnson, Larson & Held, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent/cross-appellant. Timothy P. Jung, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relator/cross-respondent. 1 M. Shannon Peterson, McCollum, Crowley, Moschet, Miller & Laak, Ltd., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for intervenor-respondent. _______________________________ Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Dated: August 26, 2011 BY THE COURT: /s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
