TROY 888 LLC V SUMMIT WILSHIRE LLC (Concurring Opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS TROY 888 LLC, UNPUBLISHED November 29, 2018 Plaintiff-CounterdefendantAppellee, v No. 338393 Oakland Circuit Court LC No. 2016-153128-CZ SUMMIT WILSHIRE LLC, Defendant-CounterplaintiffAppellant, and WELLS FARGO BANK NA and MAX J CORPORATION, Defendants. TROY 888 LLC, Plaintiff-CounterdefendantAppellant, v No. 339349 Oakland Circuit Court LC No. 2016-153128-CZ SUMMIT WILSHIRE LLC, Defendant-CounterplaintiffAppellee, and WELLS FARGO BANK NA and MAX J CORPORATION, Defendants. -1- Before: SHAPIRO, P.J., and SERVITTO and GADOLA, JJ. SHAPIRO, P.J. (concurring). I concur with the majority’s well-reasoned opinion in all respects except as to the grounds for rejecting appellant’s “substantial performance” argument. I believe that a reasonable person could conclude that the conditions set out in the retention pond agreement were met even if the permanent storm drainage system was installed by a person or entity other than the City of Troy. However, I concur with the majority in affirming because it is undisputed that the substantive requirement that Sosnick or his successor “close off and stub the sewer line running from the premises to the retention pond” never took place. /s/ Douglas B. Shapiro -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
