ALLAN D SCHOPPER V ROBERT L O'CONNOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
ALLAN D. SCHOPPER,
UNPUBLISHED
October 20, 2009
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
No. 285096
Marquette Circuit Court
LC No. 07-044988-CZ
ROBERT L. O’CONNOR, MICHAEL H.
LOVELACE, and DENNIS H. GIRARD,
Defendants-Appellees.
Before: Hoekstra, P.J., and Bandstra and Servitto, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to
defendant Michael Lovelace. Plaintiff also appeals the orders granting summary disposition to
defendants Robert O’Connor and Dennis Girard. Because we conclude that the trial court
correctly granted summary disposition to defendants, we affirm.
O’Connor, a Michigan State Police trooper, investigated a complaint by plaintiff against
his neighbors. During his investigation, O’Connor learned that there was a warrant from
Outagamie County, Wisconsin, for plaintiff’s arrest. O’Connor confirmed the warrant over the
telephone with the Outagamie County Sheriff’s Office. On July 31, 2007, O’Connor went to
plaintiff’s house and returned a DVD that plaintiff had given him during the investigation. After
O’Connor informed plaintiff of the warrant, plaintiff asked if he would be arrested. O’Connor
replied that, unless plaintiff posted the $2,000 bond stated on the warrant, he would be arrested.
Plaintiff stated that he did not have $2,000, and he was then arrested by two state troopers. The
two troopers transported plaintiff to the Marquette County jail. The following day, one of
plaintiff’s family members posted the $2,000 bond, which was forwarded to the Outagamie
County court. Plaintiff was released and, pursuant to the bond form, was to appear at the
Outagamie County courthouse on August 16, 2007, for arraignment. Plaintiff failed to appear
for his arraignment, the $2,000 bond was forfeited, and a bench warrant was issued for his arrest.
Plaintiff sued O’Connor, Lovelace, the Marquette County sheriff, and Girard, the chief
judge of Marquette District Court. He claimed that defendants illegally arrested and imprisoned
him, illegally forwarded the $2,000 bond to the Outagamie County court, and failed to provide
him with the necessary extradition hearings. Defendants filed separate motions for summary
disposition, and the trial court granted each motion. We review de novo a trial court’s decision
-1-
on a motion for summary disposition. Robinson v City of Lansing, 282 Mich App 610, 613; 765
NW2d 25 (2009).
Plaintiff’s claims that the trial court erred in granting summary disposition to defendants
are without merit. First, Girard was entitled to absolute immunity. See MCL 691.1407(5).
Plaintiff’s claim against Girard arose from Girard’s actions within the scope of his judicial
authority. Second, plaintiff’s arrest was legal. A law enforcement officer may arrest a person
without a warrant if the officer “has received positive information by . . . telephonic . . . source
that another . . . court holds a warrant for the person’s arrest.” MCL 764.15(1)(e). O’Conner
received telephonic information that there was a warrant for plaintiff’s arrest from the Outagamie
County court. Because plaintiff’s arrest was legal, plaintiff’s claims for false arrest and false
imprisonment fail. Odom v Wayne Co, 482 Mich 459, 481; 760 NW2d 217 (2008). Third,
because plaintiff was released from the Marquette County jail after a family member paid the
$2,000 bond on his behalf, he cannot claim that he was not provided with proper extradition
hearings. Fourth, plaintiff did not pay the $2,000 bond. Consequently, he does not have
standing to challenge the forwarding of the bond to the Outagamie County court; he does not
have a substantial interest or personal stake in the money. See Rogan v Morton, 167 Mich App
483, 486; 423 NW2d 237 (1988).
Affirmed.
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
/s/ Richard A. Bandstra
/s/ Deborah A. Servitto
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.